Taylor Swift’s Eras tour has been a revelation across Europe. Everyone from the royal family to Paul McCartney danced to her three and a half hour shows as economists fell over themselves to hail the “Taylor Effect” on the region’s economy.
However, the head of the eurozone’s central bank seems to think people who argue that she has also become an economic force could benefit from a couple of lessons in macroeconomics.
Christine Lagarde, president of the European Central Bank (ECB), has laughed off suggestions that Taylor Swift is to blame for stubborn inflation in the region.
The latest reading showed eurozone inflation fell to 2.5% in June, closer to its target of 2%. However, services inflation, which Swift’s presence would contribute to, has remained elevated, preventing the bank from a second interest rate cut after slashing its base rate in June.
Because Swift’s time in Europe is temporary, her perceived contribution to inflation wouldn’t be “sticky.” That caused an exasperated Lagarde to dismiss the idea that she was a meaningful contributor to the continent’s stubborn price rises.
“It’s not just Taylor Swift, you know,” Lagarde told CNBC at the ECB Forum. “Others have come as well.”
Instead, Lagarde said, higher wages for service employees and rising business profits needed were the key metrics to consider before the ECB could cut rates again.
Sweden’s central bank name-checked the Taylor Swift effect as it disclosed an increase in inflation in the same month the singer performed in the country.
The Riksbank said hotel prices rose 11% in May, fueled by “gig-trippers” following Swift across the continent. That was a bigger increase than when Beyoncé performed a year earlier.
However, while Swift’s presence might have contributed to some price increases, it makes up a small part of the wider inflation pie.
The “Taylor Effect” has been documented in every region where she has taken her bumper Eras tour this year. It’s even helped her football player boyfriend Travis Kelce cash in, saying he now commands more lucrative sponsors for his New Heights podcast with brother Jason since his romance with Swift went public.
Several banks and think tanks have run economic analysis pieces that put her economic impact into the billions. The impact in Europe is expected to be bigger than in the U.S., as Americans took advantage of a strong dollar and EU regulations on ticket resale prices to get a better deal.
One report by Barclaycard suggested Taylor Swift’s U.K. legs would deliver a £1 billion ($1.3 billion) injection to the country’s economy.
The Financial Times Alphaville investigated the report and found eyebrow-raising figures behind the calculation, including an average travel spend of £110.80 to get to her gigs and £60 on a meal beforehand.
The survey was also based on a small sample size of 200 people who either had tickets or were “looking to secure” tickets to one of Swift’s concerts. Barclaycard also informed Alphaville that the figures were an average of the responses, with the more reliable median expected to be lower.
Swift is undoubtedly a generational tour de force, but analysts should look elsewhere before blaming her for European inflation’s cruel summer.
© 2024 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.
